<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Development &#38; SEO Blog by HMSPANEL &#187; Browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hmspanel.com/blog/category/browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hmspanel.com/blog</link>
	<description>#1 Geek source for programming development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Chrome for Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.hmspanel.com/blog/2009/08/22/google-crome-for-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hmspanel.com/blog/2009/08/22/google-crome-for-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmspanel.com/blog/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is working on 64-bit Chrome version for Linux.
New browser version must work with all new processors and Linux versions. The biggest part of the job done by V8 group, who is also working on javascript
engine of the browser. &#8220;The v8 team did some amazing work this quarter building
a working 64-bit port. After a handful [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is working on 64-bit Chrome version for Linux.</p>
<p>New browser version must work with all new processors and Linux versions. The biggest part of the job done by V8 group, who is also working on javascript<br />
engine of the browser. &#8220;The v8 team did some amazing work this quarter building<br />
a working 64-bit port. After a handful of changes on the Chromium side, I have<br />
had Chromium Linux building on 64-bit for the last few weeks.  I<br />
believe mmoss or tony is going to get a buildbot running, and working<br />
on packaging.&#8221; &#8211; said Google developer McNamee in this <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev/browse_thread/thread/701cd2dadcc639d3/e55c246a7e4e8ce3?#e55c246a7e4e8ce3">post</a></p>
<p><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hmspanel.com/blog/2009/08/22/google-crome-for-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JavaScript And The rel Attribute</title>
		<link>http://www.hmspanel.com/blog/2009/06/30/javascript-and-the-rel-attribute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hmspanel.com/blog/2009/06/30/javascript-and-the-rel-attribute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmspanel.com/blog/2009/06/30/javascript-and-the-rel-attribute/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Working in JavaScript is one of my favorite things to do. I love how dynamic
the language is and how powerful it can be. This programming dream is often
turned into a nightmare by varying browser implementations, blatant disregard
for accepted Web Standards (I’m looking at you IE), and a host of other odd
things that can pop up.
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working in JavaScript is one of my favorite things to do. I love how dynamic<br />
the language is and how powerful it can be. This programming dream is often<br />
turned into a nightmare by varying browser implementations, blatant disregard<br />
for accepted Web Standards (I’m looking at you IE), and a host of other odd<br />
things that can pop up.</p>
<h3>The Problem</h3>
<p>As is usually the case, Internet Explorer is very forgiving when it comes to<br />
the DOM and lots of times implements alternate methods of accessing certain<br />
functionality.</p>
<p>In my current project I am using the rel attribute to keep track of which row<br />
of data is being accessed. I know some of you may frown on this, however, it is<br />
an acceptable (to me) tactic as this is for a closed intranet where there is no<br />
concern for search engines. In Internet Explorer object.rel is an acceptable<br />
method for accessing the value of the rel attribute of a particular property.</p>
<p>Somehow I worked past this point without testing in Firefox so when an error<br />
kept occurring that was caused by Firefox not liking object.rel it took me a<br />
while to work back through the code to isolate this problem.</p>
<h3>The Resolution</h3>
<p>The problem has a really simple fix. In my case it was harder locating the<br />
problem then actually fixing it. To get around this problem you don’t need any<br />
object detection, you just need to use the standard method for accessing<br />
attributes, object.getAttribute(’rel’). Go figure.</p>
<h3>The Moral Of This Story</h3>
<p>The lesson that we should take away from this is to only use approved,<br />
standard methods of functionality. This too will lead you into problems due to<br />
inconsistent implementations but at least you are doing it the right way. You<br />
can then implement your own work-arounds or use a library like Dean Edwards’ IE7<br />
script that will fill in all the holes in Internet Explorer to make it more<br />
standards compliant.</p>
<p><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hmspanel.com/blog/2009/06/30/javascript-and-the-rel-attribute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
